[cabfpub] Ballot 133 - Insurance Requirements for EV Issuers

[Eddy Nigg]

On 10/22/2014 12:40 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:
> On 21/10/14 21:58, Kelvin Yiu wrote:
>> Microsoft abstains, on the reason that the ballot does not directly
>> improve the security of CA operations or benefit end users. Microsoft
>> does support simplifying CA insurance requirements in the EV guidelines
>> and will support a ballot similar to ballot 121.
> Mozilla votes No.
>
> If these insurance requirements were clearly a relaxation and a
> simplification, we might have voted Yes, on the grounds that it's a step
> towards eliminating them. But I have sufficient doubt that they actually
> are a relaxation and simplification.

In that case the ballot is effectively dead I believe...now how we go 
about reviving ballot 121 ?

-- 
Regards
Signer: 	Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO
	StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org>
XMPP: 	startcom at startcom.org <xmpp:startcom at startcom.org>
Blog: 	Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org>
Twitter: 	Follow Me <http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20141022/51329b34/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4313 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20141022/51329b34/attachment-0001.p7s>