[cabfpub] Ballot 133 - Insurance Requirements for EV Issuers

[Gervase Markham]

On 14/10/14 08:23, N. Atilla Biler wrote:
> However, if the current text still does not satisfy the opponents of the
> concept of SSL insurance in and of itself, especially browsers like
> Google and Mozilla who expressed direct objection to the efforts of
> finding a suitable wording for SSL insurance requirements may prepare
> another ballot after the voting for Ballot 133 ends for totally
> releasing the insurance requirement from the EV Guidelines or to pull
> the requirements back to Ballot 121 content.

On the principle that "half a loaf is better than no bread", I agree.

Gerv