[cabfpub] Ballot 110 - Motion to Adopt Version 1.1 of the Bylaws
Dean_Coclin at symantec.com
Tue Jan 21 15:54:12 UTC 2014
The CSWG has discussed sensitive information around threats to the ecosystem
and I would prefer that it not be made public at this time. The results of
these discussions will work their way into the Code Signing BRs which will
be released for public comment in the next few months.
From: Wayne Thayer [mailto:wthayer at godaddy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:48 AM
To: Gervase Markham; Dean Coclin; Ryan Sleevi; Ben Wilson
Subject: RE: [cabfpub] Ballot 110 - Motion to Adopt Version 1.1 of the
Archives of the code signing and EV improvements mailing lists are currently
private, and these lists aren't set up to allow non-members to subscribe.
Unless someone disagrees with Gerv's (and my) interpretation of the bylaws,
I'll change them to match the public list.
From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On
Behalf Of Gervase Markham
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 4:53 AM
To: Dean Coclin; Ryan Sleevi; Ben Wilson
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 110 - Motion to Adopt Version 1.1 of the
On 20/01/14 16:38, Dean Coclin wrote:
> My understanding is that the working group lists are not public.
That's surprising to me; I believe that the intent was that they would be,
and that (as Wayne notes) the bylaws seem to suggest that view also.
"Managed in the same fashion as the Public Mail List" implies that they are,
you know, public :-) Otherwise it would have said "Management Mail List".
Having them as public also resolves the tension that has been pointed out on
this thread - the "inform the main list" function is then only one of
notification, not disclosure, and people can always go looking for more
information if they want it.
So if they aren't public, perhaps we should fix that.
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6130 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Public