[cabfpub] Ballot 107 - removing version numbers to WebTrust and ETSI standards from CABF Guidelines

i-barreira at izenpe.net i-barreira at izenpe.net
Wed Jul 24 01:41:47 MST 2013


Hi Mads,

 

Just a small remark

 

-          In 3. References I´d say ETSI TS 119 403, Electronic Signatures ... So I´d include the document number regarding the TSP conformity assessment

 

I can be also the second endorser

 

Regards

 

 

Iñigo Barreira
Responsable del Área técnica
i-barreira at izenpe.net

945067705

 

 

ERNE! Baliteke mezu honen zatiren bat edo mezu osoa legez babestuta egotea. Mezua badu bere hartzailea. Okerreko helbidera heldu bada (helbidea gaizki idatzi, transmisioak huts egin) eman abisu igorleari, korreo honi erantzuna. KONTUZ!
ATENCION! Este mensaje contiene informacion privilegiada o confidencial a la que solo tiene derecho a acceder el destinatario. Si usted lo recibe por error le agradeceriamos que no hiciera uso de la informacion y que se pusiese en contacto con el remitente.

 

De: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] En nombre de Mads Egil Henriksveen
Enviado el: miércoles, 24 de julio de 2013 10:32
Para: public at cabforum.org
Asunto: [cabfpub] Ballot 107 - removing version numbers to WebTrust and ETSI standards from CABF Guidelines

 

Hi

 

During our discussion on coordinating audit and standards cycle in Munich, I suggested to remove the version numbers in CABF Guidelines to specific WebTrust and ETSI version numbers as this creates a circular and inconsistent result. 

 

This ballot removes the version numbers from EV Guidelines and the Baseline Requirements (BR). 

 

I have included some additional changes which I consider reasonable; The ETSI TS 102 042 comprises seven different set of policy requirements for different types of certificates, both SSL and non-SSL certificates. I have included the specific CPs for SSL certificates explicitly in the references to TS 102 042 where this is relevant. The following CPs are referenced; Domain Validation (DVCP), Organizational Validation (OVCP), Extended Validation (EVCP) and enhanced Extended Validation (EVCP+). 

 

I have also deleted some links to explicit documents on the web. Such document links might change, and the interested reader will find the document anyway.

 

I am also looking for a second endorser for this motion. 

 

Find redlined versions of relevant sections from EV Guidelines and Baseline Requirements attached. 

 

Regards
Mads

 

 

Ballot 107 - Removing version numbers to WebTrust and ETSI standards from CABF Guidelines (EVG and BR)

 

Mads Henriksveen made the following motion, and Ben Wilson from DigiCert and _______ from _______ endorsed it: 

 

Motion Begins 

 

Baseline Requirements (BR)

 

Document History

 

Implementers' Note: Version 1.1 of these SSL Baseline Requirements was published on September 14, 2012. Version 1.1 of WebTrust's SSL Baseline Audit Criteria and ETSI Technical Standard Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI) 102 042 version 2.3.1 incorporate version 1.1 of these Baseline Requirements and are currently in effect. See http://www.webtrust.org/homepage-documents/item27839.aspx and also http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/102000_102099/102042/02.03.01_60/ts_102042v020301p.pdf.

 

Section 3. References

 

ETSI Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Trust Service Provider Conformity Assessment - General Requirements and Guidance, available at: http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/119400_119499/119403/01.01.01_60/ts_119403v010101p.pdf.

 

ETSI TS 102 042 V2.1.1, Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Policy requirements for certification authorities issuing public key certificates.

 

WebTrust Program for Certification Authorities Version 2.0, available at http://www.webtrust.org/homepage-documents/item27839.aspx.

 

Section 17.1 Eligible Audit Schemes

 

The CA SHALL undergo an audit in accordance with one of the following schemes: 

1. WebTrust Program for Certification Authorities v2.0 audit; 

2. A national scheme that audits conformance to ETSI TS 102 042 audit including DVCP, OVCP, EVCP or EVCP+; 

3. A scheme that audits conformance to ISO 21188:2006; or 

4. If a Government CA is required by its Certificate Policy to use a different internal audit scheme, it MAY use such scheme provided that the audit either (a) encompasses all requirements

 

EV Guidelines(EVG)

 

Section 8.2.1 Implementation

 

(B) Implement the requirements of (i) the then-current WebTrust Program for CAs, and (ii) the then-current WebTrust EV Program or (ii) the then-current ETSI TS 102 042 EV Certificate Policies (EVCP or EVCP+) V2.1.1; and

 

Section 8.2.2 Disclosure

 

Each CA MUST publicly disclose their EV Policies through an appropriate and readily accessible online means that is available on a 24x7 basis. The CA is also REQUIRED to publicly disclose its CA business practices as required by both WebTrust for CAs and ETSI TS 102 042 V2.1.1. The disclosures MUST be structured in accordance with either RFC 2527 or RFC 3647.

 

Section 17.1 Eligible Audit Schemes

 

A CA issuing EV Certificates SHALL undergo an audit in accordance with one of the following schemes: 

(i) WebTrust Program for Certification Authorites audit and WebTrust EV Program audit, or 

(ii) ETSI TS 102 042 v2.1.1 audit including EVCP or EVCP+. 

 

Section 17.4 Pre-Issuance Readiness Audit

 

(2) If the CA has a currently valid ETSI 102 042 audit, then, before issuing EV Certificates, the CA and its Root CA MUST successfully complete a point-in-time readiness assessment audit against ETSI TS 102 042 V2.1.1 EVCP or EVCP+. 

(3) If the CA does not have a currently valid WebTrust Seal of Assurance for CAs or an ETSI 102 042 audit, then, before issuing EV Certificates, the CA and its Root CA MUST successfully complete either: (i) a point-in-time readiness assessment audit against the WebTrust for CA Program, or (ii) a point-in-time readiness assessment audit against the WebTrust EV Program, or an ETSI TS 102 042 V2.1.1. audit including EVCP or EVCP+.

 

The review period for this ballot shall commence on July 24th, 2013 and will close on July 31, 2013. Unless the motion is withdrawn during the review period, the voting period will start immediately thereafter and will close at August 7th, 2013. Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread.

Motion Ends

A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a voting member before the close of the voting period will be counted. Voting members are listed here: http://www.cabforum.org/forum.html <http://www.cabforum.org/forum.html>  In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast by members in the CA category and one half or more of the votes cast by members in the browser category must be in favor. Also, at least seven members must participate in the ballot, either by voting in favor, voting against, or abstaining.

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20130724/5f9719a8/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 19121 bytes
Desc: image001.png
Url : https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20130724/5f9719a8/attachment-0001.png 


More information about the Public mailing list