[cabfpub] Ballot 107 - Removing version numbers to WebTrust andETSI standards from CABF Guidelines (EVG and BR)

Rick Andrews Rick_Andrews at symantec.com
Thu Aug 8 18:47:30 UTC 2013


We agree with Gerv. Symantec votes NO.

-Rick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org]
> On Behalf Of Gervase Markham
> Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 8:16 AM
> To: ben at digicert.com
> Cc: public at cabforum.org
> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 107 - Removing version numbers to
> WebTrust andETSI standards from CABF Guidelines (EVG and BR)
> 
> On 30/07/13 16:59, Ben Wilson wrote:
> > We could, but we might want to rewrite the paragraph and explain it
> more.
> 
> Mozilla votes NO - see below for why.
> 
> Looking at the discussion history for ballot 107, it was proposed, and
> then various people provided comments, but it has not been withdrawn or
> resubmitted, and voting ends tomorrow. (With one early vote from Trend
> Micro and one from GlobalSign being the only current outstanding
> votes).
> 
> I think consideration needs to be given to the feedback provided and
> so,
> to prevent it 'accidentally' passing when most people seem not to have
> voted, Mozilla votes NO. We are not against in principle, but we wish
> to
> see either a good explanation of why the proposed changes are not
> necessary, or the ballot being withdrawn and updated. If the former is
> provided before the deadline, we would certainly consider changing our
> vote.
> 
> Unfortunately, I am not able to be on the call today.
> 
> Gerv
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public



More information about the Public mailing list