[cabfpub] [cabfman] Ballot 92 - Subject Alternative Names

[Steve Roylance]

Kirk,

It is NOT meant to prohibit  all types of DV SANs

It is meant to prohibit DV SANs under certain conditions i.e. where non
unique information is contained, or Public IPs are used, or there is a
mixture of owners as detailed by the domain registration.

If you own kirk.com and finewineexpert.com then you can have both inside if
they are registered to you.

Please read the text again carefully and highlight which situation you
specifically don't agree with and why you feel it's acceptable to continue.

Steve

From:  "kirk_hall at trendmicro.com" <kirk_hall at trendmicro.com>
Date:  Friday, 16 November 2012 17:24
To:  CABForum Management <management at cabforum.org>, "public at cabforum.org"
<public at cabforum.org>
Subject:  Re: [cabfman] [cabfpub] Ballot 92 - Subject Alternative Names

To help members evaluate Ballot 92 we are attaching a side-by-side
comparison of current Baseline Requirements language with the proposed new
language.  As before, the intent of this ballot is to prohibit DV SANs
certificates, which we will oppose.
 
Trend Micro does not issue DV certificates, but we think they serve a
valuable security function in increasing the use of SSL.  Forcing customers
to buy OV certs instead is anti-competitive and will likely lead to less use
of SSL to secure sites.
TREND MICRO EMAIL NOTICE
The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential
and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or
disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail
or
telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.
_______________________________________________ Management mailing list
Management at cabforum.org https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/management

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20121116/c6542d35/attachment-0004.html>