[Cscwg-public] [EXTERNAL] Update to the working draft

Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) dzacharo at harica.gr
Wed Apr 8 12:10:56 MST 2020

On 2020-04-08 9:03 μ.μ., Bruce Morton wrote:
> Hi Dimitris,
> I don’t think that we need to add the definitions of "Root CA" and 
> "Root Certificate" as they are already defined in the Baseline 
> Requirements.

Hi Bruce,

At the last meeting we agreed to try having the Code Signing documents 
as "independent" as possible, but I guess this needs to happen for other 
definitions as well. If this is a process for a later time, we can 
remove these definitions for now.

> Regarding section 12, where did the “sign” text come from. I don’t see 
> this in BR version 1.6.9?

Section 6.1.7 of the BRs.

> Regarding section 17.1, I updated the WebTrust and the ETSI audit 
> criteria, but did not include the government criteria as we agreed to 
> drop this option.

I can't recall this but I could be wrong. Is it captured in any previous 
meeting minutes? This is also in the CSCWG charter as an eligible scheme 
for participation 

I don't have a strong opinion but I'd like to know the rationale for 
such a decision. If it's part of previous minutes or discussion on the 
mailing list, it would help.

Best regards,

> Thanks, Bruce.
> *From:* Cscwg-public <cscwg-public-bounces at cabforum.org> *On Behalf Of 
> *Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Cscwg-public
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 28, 2020 2:23 PM
> *To:* cscwg-public at cabforum.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL][Cscwg-public] Update to the working draft
> *WARNING:* This email originated outside of Entrust Datacard.
> *DO NOT CLICK* links or attachments unless you trust the sender and 
> know the content is safe.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> As agreed, I have done the following updates to the latest draft 
> circulated by Bruce:
>  1. Added the definitions of "Root CA" and "Root Certificate"
>  2. Updated section 12 for what a Root Key is allowed to sign
>  3. Updated section 17.1 with the currently available audit schemes.
> Let me know if you have any questions or comments related to those 
> changes.
> Thank you,
> Dimitris.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/cscwg-public/attachments/20200408/a62fd7ec/attachment.html>

More information about the Cscwg-public mailing list